home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
-
- ORDER LIST
-
- TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 1993
-
-
-
- APPEAL -- JURISDICTION NOTED
-
-
- 93-44 TURNER BROADCASTING SYSTEM V. FCC, ET. AL.,
-
- In this case probable jurisdiction is noted. The
-
- brief of appellant is to be filed with the Clerk and
-
- served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m.,
-
- Tuesday, November 9, 1993. The briefs of appellees are to
-
- be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel
-
- on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, December 7, 1993. A reply
-
- brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served
-
- upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday,
-
- December 21, 1993. Rule 29 does not apply.
-
-
-
- CERTIORARI GRANTED
-
-
- 93-70 ) OREGON WASTE SYSTEMS, ET AL. V. DEPT. OF ENVTL. QUALITY
- )
- )
- 93-108) COLUMBIA RESOURCE CO. V. DEPT. OF ENVTL. QUALITY
-
- The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.
-
- The cases are consolidated and a total of one hour
-
- is allotted for oral argument. The briefs of petitioners
-
- are to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing
-
- counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, November 9, 1993.
-
- The brief of respondents is to be filed with the Clerk
-
- and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m.,
-
- Tuesday, December 7, 1993. A reply brief, if any, is to
-
- be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel
-
- on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, December 21, 1993. Rule 29
-
- does not apply.
-
- 93-144 DEPT. OF REV. OF MONTANA V. KURTH RANCH, ET AL.
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
-
- The brief of petitioner is to be filed with the Clerk
-
- and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m.,
-
- Tuesday, November 9, 1993. The brief of respondents is
-
- to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing
-
- counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, December 7, 1993.
-
- A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and
-
- served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m.,
-
- Tuesday, December 21, 1993. Rule 29 does not apply.
-
- 93-180 BOCA GRANDE CLUB, INC. V. FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT, ETC.
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
-
- The brief of petitioner is to be filed with the Clerk
-
- and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m.,
-
- Tuesday, November 9, 1993. The brief of respondents is
-
- to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing
-
- counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, December 7, 1993.
-
- A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and
-
- served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m.,
-
- Tuesday, December 21, 1993. Rule 29 does not apply.
-
-
-
-
-
- 92-8556 NICHOLS, KENNETH O. V. UNITED STATES
-
- The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of
-
- certiorari is granted limited to Question 1 presented
-
- by the petition. The brief of petitioner is to be
-
- filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel
-
- on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, November 9, 1993. The
-
- brief of respondent is to be filed with the Clerk and
-
- served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m.,
-
- Tuesday, December 7, 1993. A reply brief, if any, is to
-
- be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel
-
- on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, December 21, 1993. Rule 29
-
- does not apply.
-
- 92-8894 VICTOR, CLARENCE V. NEBRASKA
-
- The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of
-
- certiorari is granted limited to Question 3 presented
-
- by the petition. The case is consolidated with No. 92-9049,
-
- Sandoval v. California, and a total of ninety minutes is
-
- allotted for oral argument. The brief of petitioner is to
-
- be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel
-
- on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, November 9, 1993. The
-
- brief of respondent is to be filed with the Clerk and
-
- served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m.,
-
- Tuesday, December 7, 1993. A reply brief, if any, is to
-
- be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel
-
- on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, December 21, 1993. Rule 29
-
- does not apply.
-
-
- 92-9049 SANDOVAL, ALFRED ARTHUR V. CALIFORNIA
-
- The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of
-
- certiorari is granted limited to Question 1 presented
-
- by the petition. The case is consolidated with No.
-
- 92-8894, Victor v. Nebraska, and a total of ninety
-
- minutes is allotted for oral argument. The brief of
-
- petitioner is to be filed with the Clerk and served
-
- upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday,
-
- November 9, 1993. The brief of respondent is to be
-
- filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel
-
- on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, December 7, 1993. A reply
-
- brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served
-
- uopn opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday,
-
- December 21, 1993. Rule 29 does not apply.
-
-
-
-
-